Better Player Essays - African-American Culture, Rapping, Reggaeton

Better Player Essays - African-American Culture, Rapping, Reggaeton Better Player A wide range of types of music express various sentiments and thoughts regarding social practices. Regardless of whether the thoughts are not regularly acknowledged, craftsmen can utilize their music to communicate. One sort of well known music that does only that is rap. The beginnings of rap are accepted to have originated from African rhythms, which were utilized as a type of correspondence by the local people groups. Rap developed and picked up in notoriety in the 1960's the point at which a couple of progressive DJ's, including Kool DJ Herc, DJ Lovebug Starski, and DJ Hollywood, started to work square gatherings in the Bronx. They would get huge speakers, attach them to a turntable and play two of a similar record simultaneously, rehashing a similar segment of the vinyl again and again by scratching it. Different entertainers would recite and shout to the group. In 1979, music organizations recorded rap just because. Such goes about as The Sugar Hill Gang, The Fatback Band, and Grandmaster Flash were among the first to pick up notoriety. The early ubiquity of rap was thwarted by a failure to contact new crowds. After much discussion, MTV started to show recordings to dark craftsmen. These specialists were displayed fundamentally on the new program Yo! MTV Raps. The rhythms and the verses pulled in a range of audience members, from downtown minorities to rural privileged whites. Indeed, even with rap musics generally enormous after, it isn't ordinarily acknowledged by our general public on the grounds that a significant number of todays rap craftsmen utilize unrefined and hostile subjects for their tunes. Some rap craftsmen even express how they feel about sex jobs through their music. One such tune by Too Short, Better Player, shows how he really feels about ladies. In spite of the fact that his emotions don't speak to the entire rap network, many do acknowledge and communicate them. Too Shorts melody portrays how nobody is a superior player than him. At the point when he alludes to player, he is discussing how smooth he is with ladies and how he can cause them to do things that he needs them to do. He alludes to ladies more as assets than as individuals regularly. One case of this is the point at which he says, chilling at the club with every one of your ladies, which seems like he possesses the ladies and that they are not there on their own unrestrained choice. The principle subject of this tune is that ladies are feeble animals who are just bravo thing, sex. He demonstrates this when he says, I be f*****g tools each day of the week. He takes a gander at sex from an alternate point of view than the normal individual. To him, sex is simply something pleasurable with no connection to adore. He likewise doesnt accept that sex ought to be held for one individual after marriage. He shows this when he says, I get some new diggers and do it once more. The possibility of predominance over ladies is additionally obvious when he alludes to them as bitches and tools. The vast majority would disapprove of being called things like bitches and diggers, yet it is an ordinary thing among many rap craftsmen. Albeit numerous individuals concur with Too Shorts points of view on ladies, these thoughts do negate current social qualities. Current qualities hold ladies as equivalents to men, and once in a while much higher than men. Ladies have been held as low class residents for a long time, and in the event that anybody ought to see how this feels, African American rappers should. Possibly experiencing childhood in ghettos and being around drugs have made these rappers have such a great amount of irreverence for themselves that it appears nature to slight the other gender.

The Iron Heel Study Guide

The Iron Heel Study Guide The Iron Heelâ is an early tragic novel distributed in 1908 by Jack London. London is most popular for his man-against-nature books like The Call of the Wild and White Fang, so The Iron Heelâ is oftenâ considered a takeoff from his standard output.â The Iron Heelâ is composed from the primary individual viewpoint of a female hero, andâ it incorporates aâ presentation of London’s communist political standards, the two of which were bizarre for now is the ideal time. The book tends to Londons conviction that unionized work and communist political developments would adapt to the situation the customary industrialist power base. Later scholars, for example, George Orwell frequently unequivocally notice The Iron Heel as an effect on their own works. Plot The epic starts with a foreword composed by Anthony Meredith in the 419 BOM (Brotherhood of Man), roughly the 27th century. Meredith examines the Everhard Manuscript as an authentic archive, formed by Avis Everhard and portraying the occasions of 1912 through 1932. Meredith cautions that the original copy is loaded with mistakes of certainty, however demands its incentive as a firsthand record of those â€Å"terrible times.† Meredith takes note of that the composition, composed by Avis Everhard, can't be viewed as goal since she is expounding on her own better half and was herself excessively near the occasions to have objectivity. In the Everhard Manuscript legitimate, Avis depicts meeting her future spouse, communist extremist Ernest Everhard. She discovers him ineffectively prepped, vainglorious, and aggravating. Ernest contends that the American arrangement of financial aspects depends on the maltreatment and poor treatment (as it were, the abuse) of work, and that the normal laborers who prop everything up endure awfully. Avis at first doesn't concur, however later she leads her own examination of Ernest’s guarantees and is stunned to find sheâ agrees with his evaluation. As Avis turns out to be near Ernest, her dad and a family companion (Dr. John Cunningham and Bishop Moorehouse) likewise start to concur with his thoughts. Every one of the four key characters start to work for the communist causes. Accordingly, the oligarchs who own and run the nation under the pretense of free enterprise and majority rule government move to destroy them all. Dr. Cunningham loses his showing employment and his home. Religious administrator Moorehouse is seen as clinically crazy and is focused on a refuge. Ernest wins political race as a Representative in Congress, however is confined as a plotter in a psychological oppressor plot and is sent to jail, alongside Avis. Avis is discharged a few months after the fact, trailed by Ernest. The two escape into covering up and start plotting an upset. Before move can be made, the administration and oligarchs-which Ernest by and large calls The Iron Heel-structure a private armed force, legitimized by the powerless government. This private armed force gets under way a bogus banner mob in Chicago. The private armed force, called the Mercenaries, viciously squashes the mob, slaughtering numerous and utilizing fierce strategies. Priest Moorehouse, got away from imprisonment, is executed in the mob. Toward the finish of the novel, Avis expounds hopefully on the designs for a second uprising that Ernest is sure will succeed. In any case, as the peruser knows from Meredith’s forward, this subsequent uprising will fall flat, and The Iron Heel will manage the nation for a considerable length of time until the last insurgency that shapes the Brotherhood of Man. The composition closes unexpectedly, and Meredith clarifies that Avis Everhard shrouded the book since she realized she was going to be captured. Significant Characters Anthony Meredith. A student of history from the far future, perusing and making notes on the purported Everhard Manuscript. He is deigning and high and mighty towards Avis and regularly remedies her; in any case, his comments uncover his restricted comprehension of the mid 20thâ century time that he contemplates. The readerâ gets to know Meredith basically through his marginalia, which adds detail and setting to the novel. Avis Everhard. Bornâ into riches, Avis is at first pompous of the predicament of the common laborers. Through the span of her original copy, be that as it may, she considers her to be self as gullible and adolescent, and she turns into a wild advocate of upheaval. There is proof that Avis isn't totally dependable and that her center perspectives have not so much transformed; she regularly utilizes impolite language to portray the common laborers even as she is communicating in the language of upheaval. Ernest Everhard. An enthusiastic adherent to communism, Ernest is demonstrated to be savvy, truly amazing, and a bold open speaker. Meredith infers that Ernest Everhard was simply one of many key individuals in the beginning of the upset, recommending that Avis mayâ be romanticizing Ernest all through her original copy. Most pundits trust Ernest speaks to London himself and his center convictions. Dr. John Cunningham. Avis’ father, a praised scholarly and researcher. He is at first a supporter of the norm, yet gradually becomes persuaded of Ernest’s cause. He loses his status in the public arena therefore and later vanishes; Avis suspects he is abducted by the administration. Diocesan Moorehouse. A pastor who experiences a comparable change in viewsâ as Dr. Cunningham, in the end giving his life in the push to oppose the theocracy. Artistic Style The Iron Heel is a work of tragic fiction. Tragic fictionâ presents a universe that is at chances with the author’s convictions and mentalities; for this situation, the tragic viewpoint originates from a world run by industrialist oligarchs who misuse the regular workers, misuse poor people, and savagely wreck pundits. The tale is additionally viewed as a work of delicate sci-fi, in light of the fact that in spite of the fact that it makes no notice of cutting edge innovation, it is based on a setting 700 years in front of the date of its creation. London utilized a progression of settled perspectives in the novel, each with an alternate degree ofâ reliability. On a superficial level is the casing story of Dr. Meredith, who composes from the future and looks at a work of authentic significance. He introduces himself as a confided in power, however a portion of his critique incorporates truthful blunders about twentieth century history that would be clear to the peruser, which subverts his dependability. The following perspective is that of Avis Everhard, the storyteller of the composition that makes up the majority of the content of the novel. Her dependability comes into question when she suggests that her announcements about her significant other are emotional, just as when she offers apparently derisive remarks about the political reason she purports to help. At last, the viewpoint of Ernest Everhard is given when his talks are remembered for the content. These addresses appear to be solid because of their in exactly the sa me words nature, however Avis instability makes the peruser less certain.â London additionally utilizes a procedure known as a bogus record: aâ fictional work that is introduced to the peruser as a real one. This arrogance permits London to add multifaceted nature to a novel that may somehow be a direct political tract. The Iron Heelâ contains two interweaved, multilayered bogus documents (Avis’ original copy and Meredith’s gleam on that composition). This blend a mind boggling riddle concerning whose point of view is nearest to reality. Jack London was charged a few times throughout his vocation with written falsification. Part 7 of The Iron Heel, The Bishop’s Vision, is an article composed by Frank Harris. London didn't deny that heâ copied the discourse verbatim, yet he asserted that he trusted it was a discourse conveyed by a genuine diocesan. Key Quotes â€Å"It is far simpler to see bold men pass on than to hear a quitter ask for life.† - Avis Everhardâ€Å"No man can be mentally offended. Affront, in its very nature, is emotional.† - Ernest Everhardâ€Å"Times have changed since Christs day. A rich man to-day who gives all he has to the poor is insane. There is no conversation. Society has spoken.† - Ernest Everhard Iron Heel Fast Facts Title: Iron HeelAuthor: Jack LondonDate Published: 1908Publisher: MacmillanLiterary Genre: Dystopian Science FictionLanguage: EnglishThemes: Socialism and social revolution.Characters: Anthony Meredith, Avis Everhard, Ernest Everhard, John Cunningham, Bishop Moorehouse.

I have such cool friends!

I have such cool friends! Hi folks, I know its been forever since Ive posted anything; Ive been insanely busy reading thousands of applications probably many of yours, in fact! But I did want to write briefly about something really cool that I just heard about recently One of my very good friends, Justin 08, is actually being featured on inc.com (along with his co-founder, Chris 09, and one of my other friends, Scot 08). They founded a start-up to help make learning foreign languages easier in foreign-language classrooms. Go to http://www.inc.com/college to check them out and vote! You can also check out the Lingt website at http://lingtlanguage.com. I asked Justin to write a little guest entry too, so he wrote a really nice piece for yall about his journey here at MIT. Enjoy! When I applied to MIT, I wanted to build robots. My heroes were Rodney Brooks and Marvin Minsky, and my future image of myself was in a white coat tinkering with the wired brain of some android. So, of course, I did what any MIT freshman hopped up on idealism and tech-romanticism does: I got a UROP. In Brooks Humanoid Robotics Lab, no less. I was going to publish fifteen papers, file three patents, and invent machine consciousness in my four years at MIT, I was sure of it. I just needed to learn Linux first. Building robots turned out to be harder than I had anticipated. I had built a little line-follower from tupperware, a comparator, and two photosensors in high school, but this was nothing like that. Instead of soldering together the guts of a robot, anticipating the moment when a dozen blinking LEDs would declare it alive, I was researching communications protocols and circuit compatibilities. When my grad student finally gave me an interesting project to build a sound localization device (ears) for her robot my initial burst of energy quickly fizzled when I found myself knee-deep in MATLAB dealing with microphone noise and trying to figure out what the hell a cross correlation was supposed to do. The whole thing was immensely educational, but I slowly discovered that I simply didnt have that white-coated future-self in me. It wasnt much of an identity crisis since I had three years of MIT left to figure out what I wanted to do. I was a Course 6 major from the start, fairly confident that I wanted to work with computers. About two years in, though, I started missing my old pals in the Liberal Arts: namely language, literature, and politics so much so that I skipped out on engineering altogether one semester and took Chinese, World Music, and two political science courses. I enjoyed this so much that I nearly dropped Course 6 for 17, before my adviser gave me some very good (and probably debatable) advice: an adeptness in technology would be more precious after graduation than a liberal arts education. I could read a lot and think hard to maintain an engaged interest in writing and analyzing world events, but I was unlikely to ever will myself to learn a programming language or systems architecture if I hadnt developed an intuition for technology in undergrad. So graduation finally rolled around and I was thrust into the job market, delaying the inevitable by spending that summer setting up a computer lab for a primary school in Malawi. I hadnt applied and been accepted to any software firms or investment banks like most of my friends had five months ago, remembering well the misery of pounding out code in a cubicle during a sophomore internship. I had decided instead to apply to a handful of web start-up companies in Boston and the Bay area. Two of my earliest friends at MIT had dropped out to start companies and were doing quite well the pace and challenge of start-ups seemed tantalizing, technically and creatively. When I got back from Africa, I flew straight to San Francisco, where I crashed on the couch of an MIT dropout and spent my days solving programming puzzles and interviewing with founders no older than myself. The passion and drive of all these entrepreneurial faces was deeply inspiring I suddenly felt that overwhelming char isma that I had worn when applying for that first UROP at the robotics lab. In the same way that I had wanted to solder wires and create intelligence, I wanted to start my own venture that would consume my energy, combine my interests, and grow to be something bigger than cubicled code. And so Lingt, a start-up focusing on building online technologies for foreign language classrooms, was born. I spent two summers in China during my MIT career and it took all six of those months in addition to MITs language classes to reach a point where I could really speak Mandarin. I saw an opportunity to leverage web technologies to help language students pick up the spoken language more rapidly in the setting that I thought learning occurred best the classroom. Contrary to the fleeting half-life of my interest in robotics, my passion for entrepreneurship is proving more sticky. Making sure you find your job interesting is good, but combining your interests (in my case technology and foreign language) to create your job is heaven. Business meetings, marketing strategy, and even the occasional art design keep the right side of my brain very much alive, which is perhaps the greatest benefit of choosing entrepreneurship over grad school or a real job. Whether my co-founder Chris and I succeed or fail is besides the point (so far so good); by putting together a business that was able to secure a few partners and make technology that people wanted to use, we have escaped our destiny of being pigeon-holed as the tech guys for the rest of our lives. So, dont ride college like an assembly line conveyor belt. Abandon those things that dont interest you and figure out a way to combine those things that do. Youll be much happier and better for it on th e other side.

The Effects Of Substance Abuse On Children - 1364 Words

Everyone is familiar with bullying, it’s almost like a rite of passage for most Americans; we see it in movies and are all-too familiar with it. We typically don’t think about the consequences of bullying, but studies have shown that students who are bullied at school in grades 7-12 are 50% more likely to abuse substances (Promises Treatment Center). Bullying is the act of physical or verbal tormenting over a set amount of time, usually targeted at one person or a group of people. Bullying is an international issue that ruins the victim s emotional well-being. Those who are victims of bullying can turn to drugs or other substances as a form of coping; people who bully can be shown to have abusive tendencies with these substances as well.†¦show more content†¦Students who report being bullied weekly tend to be heavier drinkers compared to those who were not bullied (Tharp-Taylor). This shows that students are more vulnerable to abuse substances because they are at the age in which they don’t feel comfortable talking to their parents, or want to try to deal with their own problems, so they turn to alcohol which can be easily accessible from a cabinet at home. Not only do victims of bullying abuse alcohol, but studies have shown that 30% of students who have been bullied also smoke marijuana (Promises Treatment Center). This study shows that students get high to self medicate so that they don’t have to deal with their low self-esteem. Low self-esteem due to bullying can stick with the victim throughout high school and sometimes even their whole life. Not only do victims suffer from substance abuse, but their aggressors as well. Bullies are just as likely to abuse substances as well as their victims. In a study conducted, 11.4% of middle school students who bully are reported to have used marijuana, and in high school, those numbers almost triple to 31.7%. When testing for alcohol and cigarette abuse, the numbers are almost iden tical (Besson). This suggests that bullies are just as vulnerable, if not more vulnerable, to abuse substances than their victims. It’s apparent that throughout the years bullies feel more

Are Tiger Sharks Dangerous Plus, More Tiger Shark Facts

Shark attacks arent as common as the news media would have you believe, and fear of sharks is largely unwarranted. The tiger shark, however, is one of the few sharks known to attack swimmers and surfers unprovoked. Its sometimes called the man-eater shark, for good reason. Are Tiger Sharks Dangerous? The tiger shark is one of the shark species most likely to attack a human unprovoked, and is considered one of the most dangerous sharks in the world for that reason. Tiger sharks are one of the Big Three aggressive shark species, along with great white sharks and bull sharks. Of 111 reported tiger shark attacks, 31 were fatal. The great white shark is the only species that attacks and kills more people than the tiger shark. Why are tiger sharks so dangerous? Tiger sharks inhabit waters where humans swim, so the chances of an encounter are greater than with deep-water shark species.Tiger sharks are big and strong, and can easily overpower a person in the water.Tiger sharks have teeth designed for shearing their food, so the damage they inflict is devastating. What Do Tiger Sharks Look Like? The tiger shark is named for the dark, vertical stripes on either side of its body, which are reminiscent of a tigers markings. These stripes actually fade as the tiger shark ages, so they cant be used as an identifying feature of every individual. Young tiger sharks have dark blotches or spots, which eventually merge into stripes. For this reason, the species is sometimes known as the leopard shark or the spotted shark. The tiger shark has a stout head and body, although narrower at the tail end. The snout is blunt and somewhat rounded. Tiger sharks are among the largest species of sharks, both in length and weight. Females are larger than males at maturity. Tiger sharks average 10 to 14 feet in length, but the largest individuals may be as long as 18 feet and weigh over 1,400 pounds.  Theyre generally solitary, but sometimes congregate where food sources are plentiful. How Is the Tiger Shark Classified? Tiger sharks belong to the family of requiem sharks; sharks that migrate and bear live young. There are about 60 species included in this group, among them the blacktip reef shark, the Caribbean reef shark, and the bull shark. Tiger sharks are the only extant species of the genus Galeocerdo. Tiger sharks are classified as follows: Tiger Shark Fast Facts Kingdom: Animalia (animals)Phylum: Chordata (organisms with a dorsal nerve cord)Class: Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fish)Order: Carcharhiniformes (ground sharks)Family: Carcharhinidae (requiem sharks)Genus: GaleocerdoSpecies: Galeocerdo cuvier The Tiger Shark Life Cycle Tiger sharks mate, with the male inserting a clasper into the female to release sperm and fertilize her eggs. The gestation period for tiger sharks is believed to range from 13 to 16 months, and a female can produce a litter every two years or so. Tiger sharks give birth to live young, and have an average litter size of 30 to 35 shark pups. Newborn tiger sharks are highly vulnerable to predation, including by other tiger sharks. Tiger sharks are ovoviviparous, meaning their embryos develop inside eggs within the mother sharks body, the egg hatches, and then the mother gives birth to live young. Unlike in viviparous organisms, tiger sharks dont have a placental connection to nourish their developing young. While carried within the mother, the egg yolk nourishes the immature tiger shark. Where Do Tiger Sharks Live? Tiger sharks inhabit coastal waters, and seem to prefer areas that are murky and shallow, like bays and estuaries. During the day, they usually stay in deeper waters. At night, they can be found hunting near reefs and in shallows. Tiger sharks have been confirmed at a depth of up to 350 meters, but generally arent considered a deep water species. Tiger sharks live throughout the world, in both tropical and warm temperate seas. In the eastern Pacific, they may be encountered from the southern California coast to Peru. Their range in the western Atlantic Ocean begins near Uruguay and extends north to Cape Cod. Tiger sharks are also known to inhabit waters around New Zealand, Africa, the Galapagos Islands, and other areas of the Indo-Pacific region, including the Red Sea. A few individuals were even confirmed near Iceland and the U.K. What Do Tiger Sharks Eat? The short answer is whatever they want. Tiger sharks are solitary, nocturnal hunters, and they dont have a preference for any particular prey. Theyll eat just about anything they encounter, including fish, crustaceans, birds, dolphins, rays, and even other sharks. Tiger sharks also have a tendency to consume garbage floating in the bays and inlets, sometimes leading to their demise. Tiger sharks also scavenge for carrion, and human remains have been found in their stomach contents. Are Tiger Sharks Endangered? Humans pose a far greater threat to sharks than sharks do to humans. Almost a third of the worlds sharks and rays are endangered and at risk of extinction, due mainly to human activities and climate change. Sharks are apex predators―top-of-the-food-chain consumers―and their decline can tilt the balance of organisms in marine ecosystems. Tiger sharks are not endangered at this time, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), although they are identified as a species near threatened. Tiger sharks are frequent victims of bycatch, meaning theyre killed unintentionally by fishing practices intended to harvest other species. Theyre also fished commercially and recreationally in some parts of their range. Although finning tiger sharks is prohibited, its likely a number of tiger sharks still die from illegal fin harvesting. In Australia, tiger sharks are baited and culled near swimming areas where shark attacks are a concern. Resources and Further Reading Ferreira, L. C, and C Simpfendorfer. â€Å"Galeocerdo Cuvier.† IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 10 Aug. 2018.Knickle, Craig, et al. â€Å"Galeocerdo Cuvier.† Florida Museum, University of Florida, 18 Oct. 2018.â€Å"Mode of Reproduction - Ovoviviparity.† SOS: Support Our Sharks.â€Å"Species Implicated in Attacks.† Florida Museum, University of Florida, 20 Aug. 2018.â€Å"Tiger Shark.† Shorefishes of the Greater Caribbean, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, 2015.â€Å"Tiger Shark (Galeocerdo Cuvier).† Northeast Fisheries Service Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 8 Jan. 2018.

Should Homosexuals Be Allowed to Marry Free Essays

string(625) " the right to marry just because of who they chose to be with\? One of my favorite sayings \(I actually heard at a gay pride festival in Ohio\) came from a couple, they said â€Å"Why do we not get the choice to marry\? Shouldn’t everyone have a choice to be miserable for the rest of their lives with the one person who actually makes them a little bit happier\? † Honestly, it is so true; there are gay and lesbian couples who have been together for 30\+ years who do not get the option to get married to their lifetime partner, where straight couples get married for a couple of years just to divorce and re marry again\." Gay marriage is a sensitive topic in America today, mainly because we Americans are split down the middle between supporting it and not supporting it. My main concern, and main reason for supporting gay marriage, has always been â€Å"who is it hurting? † The main reason I hear for not supporting them would be because they cannot reproduce. There are many reasons why gay marriage should or should not be legal and they are different in everyone’s eyes. We will write a custom essay sample on Should Homosexuals Be Allowed to Marry? or any similar topic only for you Order Now I believe that gay marriage would follow a utilitarian principle and fall under relativism and even though they cannot have children, gay marriage should be legal because there would be higher adoption rates, it is a civil right, and they are human beings. First, Gay marriage should be legal because there would be higher adoption rates. Craig, Martinez, Kane, and Gainous (2005) quotes â€Å"Support for the civil rights and liberties of homosexuals has risen as well: Most Americans now believe that gays should be permitted to teach in colleges and universities, to serve in the military, and that there should be laws banning discrimination against gays in hiring and firing, while over 40 percent are willing to allow gay and lesbian couples to adopt children. † (p. 5). America is slowly becoming more acceptable of gay and lesbian rights as well as allowing them to adopt and marry in some states. This doesn’t mean that every state in the U. S. is allowing this, and the question is why? People are afraid of the downfall that may occur in our population rates if more gay and lesbian couples are allowed to marry. This though, is not the case. I believe that there would be a spike in adoption rates. If you take into account the fact that there are hundreds probably even thousands of kids out there without having a home, and knowing that heterosexuals couples are more likely to have their own kids instead of adopting, and you will not be okay with our gay and lesbian community to marry and adopt those kids in need, is beyond me. Brian, part of a Films Media Group, film (2005) talks about his two fathers, he says â€Å"Everything I hoped for came true when Murray and Peter became my parents. I love them, I loved them for making my lunches each day as I left for school, and I loved them for caring about my thoughts and ideas. I loved them for making me feel special. † (Marriage for Homosexual Parents). This is not the only person who would testify that their parents (whether gay or straight) are not only loving but supportive of everything they do. A parent is a parent, no matter if it is a man and woman, man and man, or woman and woman. They go through same things that everyone would go through. The terrible twos, the potty training, waking up at all hours of the night, this list could go on and on but, because homosexuals are with someone of the same sex, they are now unfit to be parents. How this makes anyone an unfit parent, is beyond me. Parenting is about loving and supporting your child, no matter what the situation is. Gay and Lesbian parents are also going to be more supportive if their child ends up being gay or lesbian whereas straight couples are more likely to be disappointed or upset with their children. Arguably, it is safe to say that the more accepting we, as Americans, become of our gay and lesbian couples, and their adopting children, the less homeless kids, and the happier people we will have! Additionally, it is their civil right. I do not see how it is right that heterosexual couples have every right that Americans should have whereas homosexual couples are limited on their civil rights, regardless that they are Americans, because they date someone of the same sex. How can we as people and the government as well, truly deny a United States citizen their civil rights, which they were born into? Honestly, that is an outrage, and I for one am not okay with the fact that we can simply deny someone rights. I am sure that any other United States citizen wouldn’t be okay with their rights being taken away from them, so what gives us the right to take them away from anybody else? Maybe we should take everyone else’s rights away to marry and see if they think that this is acceptable to do. Yes, marriage may be just a piece of paper, but we are truly denying someone that paper that would make them the happiest person alive? Ferguson (2007) quotes â€Å"So, one common argument for gay marriage is that government denial of the legal right to gay marriage deprives gays and lesbians of access to the social sanction and status that marriage confers, and hence to full adulthood, rights to familial or joint property and inheritance rights, and full citizenship† (p. 40). How is it right that they are denied the right to marry just because of who they chose to be with? One of my favorite sayings (I actually heard at a gay pride festival in Ohio) came from a couple, they said â€Å"Why do we not get the choice to marry? Shouldn’t everyone have a choice to be miserable for the rest of their lives with the one person who actually makes them a little bit happier? † Honestly, it is so true; there are gay and lesbian couples who have been together for 30+ years who do not get the option to get married to their lifetime partner, where straight couples get married for a couple of years just to divorce and re marry again. I am not saying that all United States citizens do this, but our divorce rates have spiked recently, meaning that more and more people are divorcing. I do believe if we allowed gay and lesbian couples the right to marry, the divorce rates would drop instead of increasing each year. Ferguson (2007) also quotes â€Å"Refusing the right to gay marriage because of the so-called sanctity of marriage, a religious concept, would seem to deprive the sexual minority of the freedom to be free to marry if they choose a lifestyle not sanctioned by many religious denominations, and hence imposes the religious view that marriage should be a heterosexual privilege. † (p. 40). People are also against same sex marriage due to their religious views. There are so many different religions in the United States, and many of those support their people in whatever choice they decide to make but because we are a predominately Christian country, we are forced to follow their rules. I do not see how someone’s religion can make a choice concerning someone else’s life and what they chose to do with it. These two quotes made by Ferguson explain perfectly why the government is denying same sex marriage; it is completely unconstitutional that they are denying gay and lesbian couples of their constitutional rights to marry. Another reason that gay marriage should be legal is that they are human beings. If I am thinking correctly, many people were born here in the United States, and would be considered Americans, but since they chose to like someone of the same sex then they are instantly treated like aliens. I, myself, am straight and therefore get treated like every other person would. I have many gay and lesbian friends, and when we are out in public, you can see the difference on how they get treated and looked at versus myself. It sickens me to think that people how there can be so rude and inconsiderate of another person. Kurdek (2004) quotes â€Å"As one indication of the importance of identifying oneself as part of a couple, some gay and lesbian citizens of the United States are currently arguing that they, just like heterosexual citizens, are entitled to the privileges associated with having their relationships, legalized as marriages. † (p. 880). Our gay and lesbian couples are considering themselves citizens, but without all the benefits that citizens receive. I don’t understand why we cannot treat them with the same respect that we treat anyone else. There is no need to punish them for who they are dating. It is a matter of privacy as well. We do not concern ourselves with who straight couples are dating/living with, why do we need to invade others privacy just because they are with someone of the same sex. Everyone has the right to be happy, to have a job, and to get married. Homosexual couples, who are legal citizens of the United States, are getting treated like they are aliens because of their sexual orientation. How is it that we can treat heterosexuals with the upmost respect that they deserve then turn right around and treat homosexuals like trash? I do not see how that is fair or correct at all and knowing that we as Americans do not have enough respect for other individuals. A few reasons that people do not support gay marriage would be that their religion is strongly against marriage of homosexuals or the fact that homosexuals cannot reproduce children of their own. Many people truly believe that because the bible says it is wrong to be with someone of the same sex, that our gay and lesbian couples are sinning. It is also true though that Jesus said he loves everyone, and will forgive every one of their sins. I personally do not believe that homosexuals are sinning because of who they date, but there are many people out there that do. We must remember that when Jesus was living things were a lot less complex than they are in today’s time. I believe if things had been what they are now, back then, that he would be accepting of any child, no matter what person they decide to be with. People are also against same sex marriage due to the fact that gay and lesbian couples cannot reproduce children of their own. They believe that since they are not able to reproduce any children of their own, that they would be an unfit couple, and we wouldn’t have as much youth to keep our country going. This to me is not true though. There are many people who are willing to surrogate, adopt, or even go to a sperm donor to reproduce children of their own. Just because the kids would not have a â€Å"father or mother† figure in their lives does not mean that they cannot reproduce. So many kids need adopted that you would think it would be a great idea to let our homosexual couples adopt them! But, these reasons alone are what turn so many people against gay marriage. People let their religion and their beliefs get in the way to see that it is about happiness and a lifetime commitment not about religion or kids. Utilitarian Principles basically means choices, which to me would fit perfectly with our gay and lesbian couples, in a way that they would benefit from it. Mosser (2010) defines utilitarianism as a â€Å"given set of choices, the act we should choose is that which produces the best results for the greatest number affected by that choice. † (p. 1. ). To me, a utilitarian believes that we should base our results on the greater good, and what would produce the greatest outcome and affect very few people by the outcome produced. I do not see how letting our gay and lesbian couples marry would truly affect anyone else. When a heterosexual couple gets married, that decision is theirs and theirs alone. No one is affected by this decision, minus the families of cour se, and no one seems to care that they are going to pursue a life of happiness together. How would this be any different from our homosexual couples? The only parties that would truly be affected by this decision would be the couple themselves, and their families and friends. It is truly no one else’s business on what they do and how they spend their lives, but somehow we have managed to make it our business. Americans have gotten so worked up over gay marriage, and for what, a piece of paper that says two people are committed to each other? I do not understand why we have the right to deny someone that. To me, utilitarianism would be the perfect resolution for our homosexual couples, and their right to marry whoever they please. Finally, I feel that relativism is a great way to explain the individuals in a gay or lesbian relationship. Mosser (2010) defines relativism as â€Å"the idea that one’s beliefs and values are understood in terms of one’s society, culture, or even one’s own individual values. † (p. 1. 8). What relativism means to me is that each individual’s beliefs and values are going to be honored. As you can see, our homosexual couples are getting their beliefs and values thrown to the curb and for what reason? I think that people are afraid of what could happen, which is why they are extremely against it, and why our gay and lesbian couples beliefs and values get thrown aside like they never existed. People believe that homosexual couples should not have the same rights as us and that they do not share our beliefs and values. To me, I believe that these people, who think that, are the ones that do not have the same beliefs and values. Everyone has the right to be happy, to have a job, and to get married. How is it that because you like someone of the same sex, that your values and beliefs automatically don’t matter? Relativism would play a perfect role in a gay and lesbian couple’s life, as if people followed the definition or relativism, then everyone would live a happy, peaceful life. All in all homosexual couples have been getting bullied since they first came out. You would think that people would finally start calming down and realizing that they are people who, just like me and you, fall in love with someone and want to spend the rest of their lives with them. It’s sad to know that if one of them gets sick or injured and is admitted to the hospital that their lifetime partner would not be allowed in the room because they are not related to them, even though they may have been together for years. They get no benefits that a regularly married couple would get and get looked down upon society, some even losing their jobs over it. We are treating human beings like animals because they fell in love with someone of the opposite sex. People always say that you cannot help who you fall in love with, but apparently they are only talking about heterosexual couples and believe that homosexuals have a choice and that they have made a wrong one. Friends and family of mine, who are gay, have had the roughest life with all the hatred that they have received. My best friend lost his job due to the fact that he came out as being gay. I do not understand how someone can get fired over their sexual orientation. He has received multiple messages online telling him how horrible he was and that Jesus hates him. There are people out there who actually do this, send hate mail to people over their sexual orientation. It is high time that people take a step back and realize that it is time to get over their hate and fear of our homosexual community and come together as one. If this happened, in my opinion, the world would become just a little bit better and maybe all of these hate crimes would stop and people would all get treated with the respect that they deserve to get. Until then I am going to continue standing my ground, in my supports of gay marriage and equality for all! In conclusion, even though gay and lesbian couples may not be able to have hildren of their own, marriage between the couples should be legalized because more children would be adopted, it is their constitutional right as a United States citizen, and they are human beings just like you and me. I also feel that this topic would fall under utilitarianism as well as relativism as these two topics would give our gay and lesbian couples the right to be happy and marry their loved one, just like we do now! Just imagine having a child of your own, and they ended up being gay or lesbian. They would go their whole lives with nothing but hatred from everyone, and is that really how you would want your child to live? References Craig, S., Martinez, M., Kane, J., Gainous, J. (2005). Core Values, Value Conflict, and Citizens’ Ambivalence about Gay Rights. Political Research Quarterly. 58(1), 5-17. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3595591/ Ferguson, A. (2007). Gay Marriage: An American and Feminist Dilemma. Hypatia. 22(1), 39-57. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4640043/ Films Media Group. (2005). Why thee wed? Gay perspectives on same-sex marriage [H.264]. Retrieved from http://digital.films.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?aid=18596xtid=35615. Kurdek, L. (2004). Are Gay and Lesbian Cohabiting Couples Really Different from Heterosexual Married Couples? Journal of Marriage and Family. 66(4), 880-900. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600164 Mosser, K. (2010). Ethics Social Responsibility. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education How to cite Should Homosexuals Be Allowed to Marry?, Papers

Speech Geothermal Energy free essay sample

First, I have a question for you guys. How many kinds of energy you know until now? (Watch for feedback) B. Ok, so have you heard geothermal energy before? Good, I am goanna show you some pictures first. C. When I heard this term, there are few questions came out in my mind, what is the geothermal energy? how the new energy works? Is the energy clean? I think that those are what you think about, too. So recently, energy shortage becomes one of the most crucial problems all over the world, but with the development of the technology, there are few kinds of new energy came out; one of them is geothermal energy. And it has been used in many fields. Transition: So, let’s find out how geothermal can be used. First, the geothermal energy is used for producing electricity. Body 1. The most important way to use geothermal energy is producing electricity. We will write a custom essay sample on Speech Geothermal Energy or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page According to the International Geothermal Association (IGA) , it has reported that 10,715 megawatts (MW) of geothermal power in 24 countries is online, which is expected to generate 67,246 GWh of electricity in 2010. [20] B. Because geothermal power does not rely on variable sources of energy, unlike, for example, wind or solar, its capacity factor can be quite large – up to 96% has been demonstrated. [26] Except for producing electricity, second, the geothermal energy can also be used in producing heat. 2. In winter, people usually use heat in order to keep the temperature in a stable range, but I know, not in FL. A. The good example is the republic of Iceland. Geothermal power is used for many things in Iceland. 57. 4% of the energy is used for space heat. B. For centuries, the people of Iceland have used their hot springs for bathing and washing clothes. 1. The first use of geothermal energy for heating did not come until 1907 when a farmer ran a concrete pipe from a hot spring that led steam into his house. 2. In 1930, the first pipeline was constructed in Reykjavik, and was used to heat two schools, 60 homes, and the main hospital. It was a 3 km pipeline that ran from one of the hot springs outside the city. 3. In 1943, the first district heating company was started with the use of geothermal power. An 18 km pipeline ran through the city of Reykjavik and by 1945 it was connected to over 2,850 homes. [3]. 4. Currently geothermal power heats 89%[3] of the houses in Iceland and over 54% of the primary energy used in Iceland comes from geothermal sources. Now, you know that geothermal energy can be used for producing electricity and heat, so think about what is the next major way for using it. Right, that would be used in medical field. 3. Third, it is used in medical field. A. In medical field, geothermal energy has attractive prospects, every country cherish the thermal mineral water as a valuable resource. The geothermal water extracted from deep underground, it has high temperatures which often contain special chemical elements, so that it has a certain medical effects. . Conclusion In conclusion, geothermal energy is a kind of energy which is clean, safe and effective. With the development of the technology, it can be used in more field beside producing electricity and heat and used in medical field in the future. So next time you think about new energy, don’t forget geothermal energy and ,maybe you will be the next scientist who find a new way to use geothermal energy.